SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 717

S.S.JHA, R.B.DIXIT
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Vedri – Respondent


Advocates:
S.M.A. Naqvi, Deputy Govt. Advocate for State;
J.P. Gupta with R. Singh for respondent.

JUDGMENT

Dixit, J. -- 1. The lust passion and greed make the man blind, who can go to any extent in committing crimes even against his kith and kin. This is an unfortunate case, as alleged, where accused-respondent had killed his own wife and young married daughter on intervening night of 20-21st June, 1984.

2. About 20 years before the incident, deceased Shyam Sundri was married to accused-respondent and from this wed-lock after about 8 to 10 years, a daughter deceased Kamlesh was born, After about 7-8 years, accused entered into second marriage with Sukhrani and that was the beginning of befalling calamities on his first wife deceased Shyam Sundri. It is said that after selling a part of his ancestral agricultural land, accused performed marriage of his daughter deceased Kamlesh some 4-5 years before the incident with Devi Singh (PW 3). After sometime, some other agricultural lands, which stood in the name of Jagdevi (PW 7), mother of the accused, were sold and out of the sale proceeds, a plot was purchased at Gohad chauraha in the name of Sukh Rani, second wife of the accused. The deceased Shyamsundri feeling aggrieved by sale of ancestral property thereby took it as future loss t

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top