SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 429

S.P.SRIVASTAVA
Ramkali – Appellant
Versus
Mahila Shyamwati – Respondent


Advocates:
P.N. Gupta for appellants; J.P. Sharma for respondents.

ORDER

Srivastava, J. -- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the learned counsel representing the contesting respondents.

2. Perused the record.

3. The appellants feel aggrieved by the order passed by the Additional District Judge, Bhind in the proceedings under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, whereunder rejecting their objections, the application filed by Shyamwati Asharam and Ram Prasad, the present respondents No. 1 to 3 respectively had been granted the succession certificate prayed for holding them to be the only heirs of Chhotesingh who were found entitled to get the amount of Rs. 40,000/- from the Electricity Department, District Morena which stood deposited to the credit of Chhote Singh, the deceased who had died intestate.

4. The facts in brief shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this appeal lie in a narrow compass: Chhote Singh who was employed as a Line than in the Electricity Department had died on 1.12.1984 in village Chandawali No.1, District Bhind. An application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act was filed on 19.8.1994 by Shyamwati claiming to be the widow of Chhote Singh, the deceased and Asharam and Ram Prasad



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top