S.P.SRIVASTAVA
Ramkali – Appellant
Versus
Mahila Shyamwati – Respondent
Srivastava, J. -- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the learned counsel representing the contesting respondents.
2. Perused the record.
3. The appellants feel aggrieved by the order passed by the Additional District Judge, Bhind in the proceedings under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, whereunder rejecting their objections, the application filed by Shyamwati Asharam and Ram Prasad, the present respondents No. 1 to 3 respectively had been granted the succession certificate prayed for holding them to be the only heirs of Chhotesingh who were found entitled to get the amount of Rs. 40,000/- from the Electricity Department, District Morena which stood deposited to the credit of Chhote Singh, the deceased who had died intestate.
4. The facts in brief shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this appeal lie in a narrow compass: Chhote Singh who was employed as a Line than in the Electricity Department had died on 1.12.1984 in village Chandawali No.1, District Bhind. An application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act was filed on 19.8.1994 by Shyamwati claiming to be the widow of Chhote Singh, the deceased and Asharam and Ram Prasad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.