1. This petition is hereby decided finally at this stage because the petition is connected with the proceeding which is initiated against the petitioner in view of provisions of Sections 5 & 8 of the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990, (Hereinafer referred to as 'the Adhiniyam' for convenience ).

2. The proceeding has been initiated against the petitioner in view of the above mentioned provision of the Adhiniyam as the District Magistrate, Dhar has been informed that the petitioner has criminal history and therefore his being at large in the society, is dangerous to the safety and property of the citizens residing in this particular area. While showing the cause in response to the notice issued to him in view of the provisions of Section 8 of the Adhiniyam, the petitioner expressed his desire to examine certain witnesses. He also made a prayer that these witnesses be summoned by District Magistrate who was conducting the said proceeding. The District Magistrate rejected his prayer and passed an order externing him from district of Dhar and its adjacent districts, for a period of 1 year. Shri Sunil Jain submitted that the procedure adopted by District Magistrate, Dhar