S.P.KHARE
Kailash Kumar Dangi – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 26.4.1996 (Annexure P-5) of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Betul (the Prescribed Authority) by which the petitioner has been removed from the office of Surpanch of Shahpur Gram Panchayat under Section 40 of the M.P. Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act). He has also assailed the appellate order dated 18.3.1997 passed by the Additional Collector and the revisional order dated 24.11.1997 passed by the Commissioner by which the impugned order of the SDO has been upheld.
2. The petitioner was Surpanch of Gram Panchayat, Shahpur. He was directly elected to this office in the year 1994. A show cause notice was issued to him by respondent No.4 the Sub-Divisional Officer, Betul on 30.10.1995 in which fifteen charges were levelled against him. That is annexure P-1. He submitted his reply to the show-cause notice on 10.11.1995 giving his explanation on each charge. He also requested for time to produce some more documents and adduce oral evidence. That reply is Annexure P-2. He submitted another application on the same date for permitting him to examine witness
1. Union of India v. T.R. Verma = AIR 1957 SC 882
2. Khemchand v. Union of India = AIR 1958 SC 300.
6. State Bank of Patiala v. S.K. Sharma = AIR 1996 SC 1669
7. Ballabhdas v. State of M.P. = 1998 (2) JLJ 303
8. Delhi Transport Corporation v. DTC Mazdoor Congress = AIR 1991 SC 101
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.