KULDIP SINGH, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Chintamani Agarwal – Respondent
1. Special leave granted.
2. The State of Madhya Pradesh in exercise of the powers under sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act 1961 (the Act), exempted all buildings owned by the Madhya Pradesh Wakf Board (Board) from the operation of the Act The notification dated 7.9.1989 granting exemption to the Board under the above-mentioned provision of the Act was challenged before the High Court. The High Court quashed the notification on the short ground that there was no material before the State Government to reach the satisfaction that it was necessary to issue the impugned notification.
3. Learned counsel for the State of M.P. has invited our attention to the letter dated 26.3.1976, by the then Prime Minister of India addressed to the Chief Minister of the State of M.P., suggesting, for the reasons given in the said letter, to grant exemption of the provisions of the Act to the properties owned by the Wakf. Thereafter, the State of M.P. made enquiries from various other States in this respect. On receipt of the replies, the matter was considered and thereafter, the exemption notification was issued. We are satisfied that there was sufficient material be
1. S. Kandaswamy Chettiar v. State of T.N. = [(1985)1 SCC 290].
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.