SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 209

A.R.TIWARI, J.G.CHITRE
Dulesingh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Jai Singh for appellants; G. Desai, Govt. Advocate for State.

JUDGMENT

Chitre, J. -- 1. These two appeals were filed by the accused who were tried by 7th Addl. Sessions Judge, Ujjain in Sessions Trial No. 95/91. The appeals arise out-out of same decision and same trial and. therefore, they are decided by this common judgment.

2. The appellants have been convicted for offence punishable u/S. 302 r/w 149 IPC, 307r/w 49 IPC. All the appellants have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for offence punishable under provisions of S. 302 r/w 149 IPC as well as they have been sentenced with fine of Rs. 500/-, in default to undergo S.I. for three months. For committing the offence punishable u/S. 307 r/w 149, they have been sentenced to undergo R.I for seven years and to pay fine of Rs. 500/- and in default to S.I. for three months. These orders of conviction and sentences arc for committing the murder of Ramsingh and for attempting to murder of prosecution witnesses Hakamsingh, Panesingh and Ratansingh.

3. Prosecution case in brief can be stated as mentioned hereunder --

On 1.11.90 at about 12.00 noon, when the deceased Ramsingh and P.Ws. Bane singh, Hakamsingh and Ratansingh were proceeding towards tube well in the field along-with their













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top