SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 669

1999 (1) JLJ 49
D.M. Dharmadhikari and R.P. Gupta, JJ.
State of M.P. v. Rammi and others
Cr. Appeal No. 626 of 1987; against the judgment of Shri B.D. Bajpai, Sessions
Judge. Hoshangabad. passed in Sessions Trial No. 119 of 1985;
Decided on 1.9.1998.

Advocates:
V.P. Singh, Govt. Advocate for State; Rajendra Singh with RK. Shukla for respondents.

Headnote:(1) Penal Code, 1860 -- S. 302/34 -- offence proved by eye witnesses by very natural, cogent and consistent version -- being highly reliable conviction can be based upon such evidence. [Paras 23 & 27

        (2) Evidence Act, 1872 -- S. 27 -- evidence of recovery of weapons and clothes -- cannot be discarded on ground that witness was related to deceased and was a resident of another place. [Para 26

        (3) Evidence Act, 1872 -- S. 45 -- human blood found on weapons and clothes of accused persons -- is a relevant factor. [Para 26

        (4) Criminal P.C., 1973 -- 157 -- offence fully proved by direct evidence -strict compliance need not be proved to have sent the copy of FIR to the Magistrate immediately. [Para 28

        (5) Criminal P.C., 1973 -- S. 378 -- appeal against acquittal-- erroneous judgment of acquittal is not saved from strict appellate scrutiny -- power of appellate Court to review and reappreciate evidence cannot be any Rule. (1998) 3 SCC 561 (1988) 4 SCC 302 and AIR 1934 PC 227 followed [ Para 28

       ¼1½ naM lafgrk] 1860 && /kkjk 302@34 && vijk/k izR;{kn‘khZ lk{khx.k }kjk cgqr LokHkkfod] rdZiw.kZ rFkk lqlaxr o.kZu }kjk lkfcr && vf/kd voyacuh; gksus ds dkj.k ,sls lk{; ij nks"kflf) vk/kkfjr dh tk ldrh gSA ¿ iSjk 23 ,oa 27À

       ¼2½ lk{; vf/kfu;e] 1872 && /kkjk 27 && vk;q/kksa vkSj oL=ksa ds vfHkxzg.k dk lk{; && bl vk/kkj ij R;Dr ugha fd;k tk ldrk fd lk{kh e`rd dk ukrsnkj gS vkSj vU; LFkku dk fuoklh gSA ¿ iSjk 26À

       ¼3½ lk{; vf/kfu;e] 1872 && /kkjk 45 && vfHk;qDr O;fDr;ksa ds vk;q/kksa rFkk oL=ksa ij ekuo jDr ik;k x;k && lqlaxr dkjd gSA ¿ iSjk 26À

       ¼4½ naM izfØ;k lafgrk] 1973 && /kkjk 157 && vijk/k] izR;{k lk{; }kjk iw.kZr;k lkfcr && izFke bfÙkyk fjiksVZ dh izfr eftLVªsV dh vksj rqjar Hksts ikus dk vfrfu;efu"B vuqikyu lkfcr fd;k tkuk vko‘;d ughaA ¿ iSjk 28À

       ¼5½ naM izfØ;k lafgrk] 1973 && /kkjk 387 && nks"keqfDr ds fo#) vihy && nks"keqfDr dk xyrhiw.kZ fu.kZ; vfrfu;efu"B vihyh laoh{kk ls O;ko`Ùk ugha gS && lk{; ds iqufoZyksdu rFkk iquewZY;kadu dh vihy U;k;ky; dh ‘kfDr fdlh fu;e }kjk ifjlhfer ugha dh tk ldrhA ¼1998½ 3 ,l lh lh 561] ¼1988½4 ,l lh lh 302 rFkk , vkb vkj 1934 ih lh 227 vuqlfjrA ¿ iSjk 29À

JUDGMENT

Dharmadhikari, J. -- 1. Brutal murder committed in broad day light in a running bus in presence of driver, conductor and passengers escaped unpunished by the impugned judgment of acquittal passed by the Sessions Judge against which the State in appeal and the complainant in revision (Cr. Revision No. 620/86) have approached this Court. Both the cases are being decided by this Common judgment.

2. There was bitter enmity between the three accused persons on one side and the deceased on the other. Deceased Sardar Singh, his brother Shyam Singh (PW 3) and Ramdulare (PW 9) were accused of murdering Channa Babu, real brother of accused Rammi and Chhinga. The deceased and the other abovementioned accused in that case were acquitted against which an appeal in the High Court was pending.

3. According to the case of the prosecution, on 20.7.1985, deceased Sardar Singh who was a Home Guard in his dress was travelling in a bus of M.P.S.RT.C. from Babai. The three accused persons boarded the bus at a turning towards Naseerabad and at about 5.10 in the afternoon, with knives and Ballam, made a murderous assault on the deceased. The assault caused commotion in the bus. There were about 13 passengers in the bus with a seating capacity of 49. Many of them got terrified. They got down and ran away. The assault attracted attention of the conductor Ramashre (PW 8) and driver of the bus Jabbar Khan (PW 12) who questioned the accused and stopped the bus by giving a call. The assailants caused as many as eleven in-juries all over the body of Sardar Singh who died in the bus itself. The bus was taken by the driver to the Police Station Babai and F.I.R. (EX.P/11) was recorded within less than half an hour i.e. at 17.40 hrs. on the same day on the version given by conductor of the bus Ramashre (PW 8). According to the driver and conductor of the bus, named above, they knew the assailants from before and they could easily identify them. Their names were also mentioned in the F.I.R. by the conductor, Ramashre, the first informant of the incident to the police.

4. The crime was investigated by Station House Officer, Babai Ramesh Chandra Mahor (PW 13) who after recording the F.I.R. visited the spot, prepared an inquest memo and seized the blood stained clothes which were sent to the Serologist for report for confirmation of presence of human blood. The accused are said to have been formally arrested on the next day of the incident i.e. on 21.7.85 at 12.00 in the noon vide arrest memo Ex.P/26 when, it is alleged, the accused were sitting in a thatched shed under a Peepal (banyan) tree and with the approach of police force tried to run away, but were chased and arrested.

5. According to the case of the prosecution, on the information given by accused Rammi, Bhura and Chhinga under memorandums Exs.P/15, P/16 and P/17, the alleged weapons of offence i.e. Ballam and two knives as also a bush shirt concealed in a pond near graveyard in Babai were recovered and seized. The seized articles were sent to the Chemical Analyst and as per report Ex.P/29 presence of human blood on them was• confirmed.

6. All the three accused persons abjured the guilt taking a plea that only because of past enmity they were falsely implicated. They also examined a defence witness Badri Prasad (DW 1) who is alleged to be one of the passengers in the bus on the date of the incident. The said defence witness stated that one fat man had some quarrel and altercation with the deceased on occupying scat in the bus and the said unidentified person took out a knife and gave repeated blows to Sardar Singh resulting in his death.

7. The learned trial Judge in acquitting the three accused disbelieved the eye witness account given by conductor Ramashre (PW 8) and driver Jabbar Khan (PW 12) on the ground that their testimony suffers from material omissions and improvements as compared to the version of the incident given by them to the police and the Magistrate under Sections 161 & 164 Cr. P








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top