SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 900

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
Kaushalya Bai – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
P.C. Paliwal for petitioner;
Vivek Awashty for respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner was elected President of Nagar Panchayat, Badi which is a local authority constituted under M.P. Municipalities Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').

2. She was served with a show cause notice under Section 41- A of the Act (Annex. P.1) proposing her removal from the office of President on the alleged• misconduct and irregularities committed by her in discharge of her duties. She submitted a reply to the show cause notice and tried to meet each and every charge or allegations made against her. After her reply, by the impugned order dated 1.4.98 (annex. P.10) she has been removed from the office of President against which this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed.

3. Section 41-A under which the impugned action has been taken was introduced in the Act by amendment Act No. 18/97 w.e.f 21.4.97 and provision reads as under:

"41-A. Removal of President or Chairman of (1) The State Government may, at any time, remove a President, Vice President or a Chairman of a Committee, of his continuance as such is not, in the opinion of the State Government desirable in public interest or in the interest of the Council or if i






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top