SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 283

S.K.DUBEY
Hirabai – Appellant
Versus
Ramprasad – Respondent


Advocates:
D.D. Bansal for appellants; A.K. Shrivastava for respondents.

JUDGMENT

1. This is a plaintiff's second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 2nd February, 1994, passed by the District Judge, Guna in Civil Appeal No. 6-A/80 reversing the judgment and decree dated 31st August, 1980, passed in Civil Suit No. 27-A/80 by the Civil Judge, Class I. Guna.

2. The appeal was admitted by this Court on 8.8.] 994 on the following substantial question of law:

"Whether the suit was wrongly dismissed by the appellate Court with the observation that the plaintiffs have not proved that the right was used as an easementary right and this finding is against the record."

3. Facts giving rise to this appeal are thus: The plaintiffs instituted a civil suit on 9.4.1979 for declaration and permanent injunction to restrain the defendant Thakuri (since deceased) from interfering with their right of way from the ancient door which opens on the agricultural field on the East side of the defendant and joins the thorough-fare which is at a distance of about 10 to 15 feet, shown in the map annexed with the plaint. The plaintiffs averred that they are using the way from their door to go to main pathway as an easement. The defendant by raising the construction is obstruct




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top