D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, DIPAK MISRA, A.K.MATHUR
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Kanti Sharma – Respondent
Mathur, C.J. -- 1. This is a reference made by the Division Bench that in an appeal under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, the court-fee should be paid ad valorem or fixed as required under Article 11 of Schedule-II. The Division Bench of this Court has made reference whether the decision given by the Division Bench in Misc. Appeal No. 165 of 1985 (Mukund Das Maheshwari & another v. Union of India), decided on 3.9.1985, lays down the correct law or not.
The Division Bench has observed that the decision in the case of Mukund Das Maheshwari (supra) runs counter to the decision of Hon. Supreme Court given in the case of C.G. Ghanshamdas & others v. Collector of Madras, AIR 1987 SC 180, and a Single Bench decision of this Court in case of Union of India through the Defence State Officer, M.P. Circle, Jabalpur Cantt. v. University of Saugor & others, 1986 JLJ 543 = 1986 MPLJ 678 and also in Indore Development Authority v. Tarak Singh and others, 1995 JLJ 724 = AIR 1995 SC 1828, wherein the Hon. Supreme Court has approved the Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of State of M.P. v. Goverdhandas, 1993 JLJ 280= AIR 1993 MP 70.
2. The brief fac
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.