S.K.DUBEY, RAJEEV GUPTA
K. Shyamlal – Appellant
Versus
K. Sugna Devi – Respondent
Dubey, J. -- 1. This is an appeal under section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short the ‘Act') against the order dated 18.12.96, passed in Succession Case No.. 53/94 by the Second Additional District Judge, Durg.
2. The facts which are not disputed in this appeal are thus : One K. Satyanarayan was working as technician in the Bhitai Steel Plant with Personal Number 12387 and Token No. 17084. He died intestate on 22.2.92 at Bhilai. Therefore, wife of the deceased i.e. the respondent No.1 made an application under section 372 of the Act, for grant of succession certificate in respect of the debts and securities due to the deceased as detailed below :-
(i) Contributory Provident Fund Amount Rs. 1,24,230-00
(ii) Service amount Rs. 10,000-00
(iii) Gratuity Rs. 55,932-00
(iv) Fixed Deposit A/c No 208330,
Sub-Post Office, H.S.G. IIIrd Rs. 10,000-00
(v) Post Office, MPM (CTD) Espath Bhawan
SBM: CTD A/c No. 257568 Rs. 2,160-00
CTD A/c No. 250478 Rs. 2,160-00
(vi) Life cover amount Rs. 26,000-00
(vii) Share capital B.B.M. Cooperative Canteen
Account No. 197 Rs. 1,000-00
Rs. 2,31,482-00
3. The appellant objected to the grant o
2. Pavitri Devi and anr. v. Darbari Singh and ors. = [(1993) 4 SCC 392]
3. Putrobai and ors. v. Lalchand and ors. = [1993 (1) Vidhi Bhasvar 37
4. Krishna Pyari Bai Dixit (Smt.) v. Goving Mishra = (1992) JLJ 624
6. Patnam Lakshminarayan Chetti v. Grandhe Seshasma and others = (AIR 1942 Mad. 709)
8. Mohd. lkram Hussain v. State of U.P. = (AIR 1964 SC 1625)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.