S.B.SAKRIKAR
Rupabai – Appellant
Versus
Sushilabai – Respondent
1. The appellant-plaintiffs have directed this appeal against the order dated 2.3.1993 rendered by Addl. District Judge, Barwah in civil miscellaneous case No. 7/92, thereby rejecting appellants prayer to institute the suit in forma pauperis on the ground that the application-cum-suit filed under Order 33 Rule I of the CPC is barred by limitation.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the defendant No. 1. owned agricultural lands situated in village Rupkheda and respondent No. 2 is in occupation of the house constructed on the aforesaid lands. It is stated that the disputed lands are surrounded by wire fencing and the respondents circulated the electric current in the wire fencing. On 24.8.87, as a result of the wrongful act of the respondents, Gajrajsingh, husband of the appellant Rupabai got the electric shock, resulting into his death. The present appellants, LRs of the deceased filed suit for compensation against the respondents seeking permission to file the aforesaid suit in forma pauperis. The said prayer of the plaintiff-appellants was opposed by the respondent-defendants. The learned trial Court on consideration, rejected the prayer of the appellants to inst
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.