SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(MP) 851

N.P.SINGH
Gulam Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Haji Maulana Mohammad Zahoor – Respondent


Advocates:
R.P. Tiwari for applicant; Ravindra Shrivastava for non-applicant.

ORDER

1. They are heard on the objection under section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the applicant. This Court, while allowing the revision filed by the appellant, reversed the order of the first Addl. Sessions Judge, Jabalpur dated 12.7.1990 passed in Criminal Revision No. 19/89 and affirmed that of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jabalpur dated 18.12.1988 passed in Complaint Case No, I 154/88, discharging the applicant from the liability of an offence under section 420 IPC.

2. Subsequent to the dismissal of the revision petition, the non-applicant filed an application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Misc. Criminal Case No. 3680/95 and this Court while exercising the inherent powers,' recalled the order dated 8.8.1994 passed in Criminal Revision No. 595/90.

3. Shri Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant has contended that section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure prohibits the Court from altering or reviewing the final order passed, except correction of clerical errors. Therefore, the order dated 10.5.1995 passed in Misc. Criminal Case No. 3680/95 is bad in law. Shri Tiwari also placed reliance on a decision of the Apex Court in State of



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top