SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(MP) 133

S.S.JHA
Tilakraj Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Shyamabai Tiwari – Respondent


Advocates:
Manindra Shrivastava for applicant; V.P. Verma for non-applicant.

ORDER

1. This revision has been filed against the order of eviction and refusal to grant leave to defend passed by the Rent Controlling Authority.

2. Brief facts of the case are as follows: Landlady Shyamabai Tiwari filed an application for ejectment under section 23-A of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 on 24.7.1991. Notices were issued to the tenant-applicant and the tenant applicant entered his appearance through his counsel on 13.8.1991 and sought time to file reply. The case continued thereafter on different dates. On 11.12.1991, an objection was raised by the tenant applicant before the Rent Controlling Authority that summons have not been served upon him as provided under section 23- B of the Act. This objection was decided on 27.3.1992 and the Rent Controlling Authority directed summons to be issued to the tenant as provided under Sec: 23-B of the Act. The summons as required under the law were served upon the tenant on 22.4.1992. The case was fixed for 28.4.1992. On that date, the counsel for the tenant-applicant sought time to file reply. The case' was thereafter adjourned to 6.5.92, 13.5.92 and 19.5.92. On 19.5.92, an application for leave to defend as provided und







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top