SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(MP) 623

S.S.JHA
Satyabhan Singh Jadon – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
D.K. Katare for petitioner; K.B. Chaturvedi, Government Advocate
for respondents.

ORDER

1. The petitioner submits that the appointment order on the post of Upper Division Teacher (Physics) has not been issued to him in spite of his being selected by a competent selection committee and his representation was not considered by the respondents in spite of the orders of this Court.

2. The petitioner applied for the post of Upper Division Teacher in Physics in the respondent No.3 - School. He was interviewed along with other candidates by the selection committee of the school. The contention of the petitioner is that he was placed at serial No.1 in the merit list. The petitioner submits that he was selected by a committee constituted under Rule 13 of the Madhya Pradesh Ashashkiya Sikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmchariyon Ke Bharti) Niyam, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules').

3. The respondents have refused to issue appointment order to the petitioner on the ground that Rule 13(2) provides that no business shall be transacted at a meeting of the committee unless the Chairman, expert and at least two members be present thereat. Rule 13 relates to selection committee of the Secondary School and Rule 12 relates to Institutions other than Secondary School




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top