K.RAMASWAMY, G.B.PATTANAIK
Madhav Krishan – Appellant
Versus
Chandrabhaga – Respondent
G.B. PATTANAIK, J. -- 1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order dated 3.7.1995 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior in SA No. 182 of 1989.
3. The admitted facts are that Mansaram had two sons by name, Babulal and Parasram. The appellants are the descendants through Babulal and the respondents are descendants through Parasaram. In an earlier Suit No. 384-A of 1964, the respondents pleaded in their plaint that Mansaram, Babulal and Paras ram were members of the joint family and, therefore, each of them was entitled to 1/3rd share in the suit property. They sought for partition and a decree for partition by metes and bounds to the extent of their 1/3rd share in the said house. It was held that Mansaram was the exclusive owner of the property and that it was not a joint family property and that the respondents have no right to partition of the said property. The decree has become final, Mansaram, during his lifetime, had executed a registered will on 28.3.1964 bequeathing the properties to the appellants and Mansaram died on 12.12.1968. The appellants filed the suit on 14.11.1977 for declaration of title and for posse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.