SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 688

TEJ SHANKAR
Vimla Ladkani – Appellant
Versus
Chandra Prakash Ladkani – Respondent


Advocates:
N.K. Modi for appellant; K.N. Gupta for respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal under section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, has been preferred by the wife against her husband against the judgment and decree dated 6.9.1994, passed by Smt. Manjusha Namjoshi, the then Seventh Additional Judge to the District Judge, Gwalior, whereby a decree for divorce was passed against the appellant on the petition of the respondent under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

2. Admittedly, the parties were married according to Hindu rites at Gwalior on 4.12.1977 and out of the union, three sons, namely, Pankaj, Kapil and Ravi were born. The relationship between the parties was cordial and the couple was regarded as a respectable family. At the time of marriage, the petitioner's mother-in-law was residing at Nai Sadak, Lashkar, but later on, she started living in the first noor of the house of the petitioner which he tolerated in order to avoid any unpleasantness. One Mohan Sindhi used to visit the house of the respondent's mother. Respondent too had developed great intimacy with him. Respondent had a good physique and was also beautiful. She was employed in the U.Co. Bank, High Court Road Branch, Gwalior, as a Clerk. Mohan Sindhi alias Teku has got bad









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top