SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 546

M.V.TAMASKAR
Radheshyam Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
V.K. Tankha with P. Mishra for petitioner;
N.C. Jam for respondent No.4; Jha for State.

ORDER

1. This petition raises question regarding the validity of one vote cast in favour of the petitioner. The said vote was rejected under Rule 11 of the M.P. Municipalities (President and Vice President) Election Rules, 1962. Rule 11 reads as under:-

"11. Procedure upon opening each ballot box and counting of votes-

The presiding officer shall then open the ballot box and proceed to scrutinise the ballot papers. If there is more than one cross against one name or there is any mark or sign, on a ballot paper, by which the voter can be identified, such ballot paper shall be considered invalid and shall not be counted. The decision of the presiding authority shall be final in this respect. The valid votes shall then be counted by the presiding authority and the ballot paper arranged in respect of each candidate."

2. The elections of Municipal Council, Gadarwara were held and the petitioner was elected councillor. The election to the post of President, Municipal Council was held on 29.12.94. The two candidates received ten votes each. Out of 21 councillors who had participated, one vote was rejected on the ground that it was invalid under Rule 11. There was a tie between the petitioner

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top