SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 696

J.G.CHITRE
Peer Mohd. – Appellant
Versus
Hasinabee – Respondent


Advocates:
Soni for applicant; Vijaywargiya for non-applicant.

ORDER

1. The petitioner is hereby praying for invoking the powers of High Court under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'Code ').

2. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent took place at Gautampura, Indore as per Muslim religious way and was performed by one Kazi Abdul Kuddus on 4.5.82. The petitioner averred in this petition that at the time of said marriage the age of petitioner was 8 years and age of respondent was 6 years. After the marriage as record shows respondent Hasinabee resided with the petitioner in his house for about one year and thereafter they were separated. After exchange of notices, Hasinabee filed a petition for alimony in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Depalpur and by order dtd. 22:7.88, the learned Magistrate allowed her application and granted alimony to her to the tune of Rs. 200/- per month payable by petitioner Peer Mohammad. He filed a revision petition against that order bearing No. 122/88 which was decided by A.S.J. Indore on 14.2.90. The learned A.S.J. dismissed the revision petition of the petitioner and maintained the order of learned J.M.F.C.

3. In the present petition, Shri LN. Soni,







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top