SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 905

1995 JLJ 72
(SUPREME COURT)
P.B. Sawant and S.C. Agarwal, JJ.
Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti and others v. Orient Paper and Industries Ltd.
Civil Appeal No. 1810 of 1991,
Decided on 9.11.1994.

Headnote:Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1973 (M.P.) -- Ss. 19 (1), 19 (2), 17, 39 and 43 -- levy of market fees under S. 19 (1) -- is valid -- it is not necessary that payer should be a direct beneficiary.

       The purposes are in furtherance of the object of the Act, viz. to regulate the bying and selling of agricultural produce and the establishment and proper administration of markets for agricultural produce for the benefit of the agriculturists who are the primary producers of the said produce. The machinery and the facilities for which the market fees are being expended are all necessary to provide the necessary infrastructure to further the object of the Act. But for such infrastructure, the objects of the Act cannot be properly and adequately implemented. The fact that the respondent-Mills may not be the direct beneficiary of anyone or some of the said facilities or does not make use of them does not absolve it from payment of the market lees. (1954) SCR 1046 and 1005, (1961) 2 SCR 537, (1965) 2 SCR 477, (1963) Supp. 2 SCR 302, (1979) 3SCR 1217, (1982) 1 SCR 519, (1983) 3SCR 843, (1986) 1 SCR 149 and (1993) Supp. 4 SCR 461 relied on. Order of High Court relied on.

       —f"k mit eaMh vf/kfu;e] 1973 ¼e-iz-½ && /kkjk 19 ¼1½] 19 ¼2½] 17] 39 rFkk 43 && /kkjk 19 ¼1½ ds v/khu cktkj Qhl dk mn~xzg.k && fof/kekU; gS && ;g vko‘;d ugha gS fd lank;drkZ lh/ks&gh fgrk/khdkjh gksA

       iz;kstu vf/kfu;e dk mÌs‘; vxzlj djus ds fy, gS uker% && —f"k mit dk Ø; vkSj foØ; fofu;fer djus ds fy, vkSj —f"k dk mit ds fy, cktkjksa dk LFkkiu vkSj iz‘kklu —"kdksa ds Qk;ns ds fy, djuk tks ml mit ds izkFkfed mRiknd gSaA og ra= vkSj os lqfo/kk,¡ ftuds fy, cktkj Qhl O;; dh tkrh gS] lHkh] vf/kfu;e dk mÌs‘; vxzlj djus gsrq volajpuk miyC/k djkus ds fy, vko‘;d gSA ,slh volajpuk ds flok; vf/kfu;e dk mÌs‘; mfpr vkSj i;kZIr :i ls dk;kZfUor ugah gks ldrkA bl rF; ds dkj.k fd izR;FkhZ&fey bu lqfo/kkvksa dk lh/ks&gh fgrkf/kdkjh u gks vFkok budk mi;ksx ugha djrk gS] mls cktkj Qhl ds lank; ls NqVdkjk ugha fey tkrkA ¼1954½ ,l lh vkj 1046 rFkk 1005] ¼1961½ 2 ,l lh vkj 537] ¼1965½ 2 ,l lh vkj 477] ¼1963½ lIyh] 2 ,l lh vkj 302] ¼1979½ 3 ,l lh vkj 1217] ¼1982½ 1 ,l lh vkj 519] ¼1983½ 3 ,l lh vkj 843] ¼1986½ 1 ,l lh vkj 149 rFkk ¼1993½ lIyh- 4 ,l lh vkj 461 voyafcrA mPp U;k;ky; dk vkns‘k myVk x;kA

       ¿ iSjk 31À

ORDER

Sawant, J. -- 1. The respondent-Orient Paper Mills (for short 'Mills') purchases bamboos as raw material under a contract with the State Government which holds monopoly in regard to bamboos as a forest produce in view of the provisions of the M.P. Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1969 (No.9 of 1969), The bamboos are supplied to the respondent-Mills by the Forest Department of the State Government at various forest depots established for the purpose. After taking delivery from the forest depots, the Mills transports the same to its factory situated in Amlai in the district of Shahdol (M.P.). It is not disputed that forest depots from which the Mills purchases the bamboos fall within the market area of the appellant-Krishi Upaj Mandi Samitis (for short 'Committees') and the factory of the Mills also falls within the market area of Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Budhar (M.P.).

2. Under section 3 of the M.P. Krishi Upaj Mancli Adhiniyam, 1973 (for short 'the Act'), the State Government is empowered to declare by a notification its intention to establish a market for regulating the purchase and sale of such agricultural produce and in such area as may be specified in the notification, and invite objections for the same. Under section 4 thereof, after the expiry of the period specified in the notification and after considering the objections and suggestions as may be necessary, the State Government is authorised to establish, by another notification a market, for the areas specified in the notification issued under section 3 or in any portion thereof. Under section 5, in every market area, there has to be a market yard and there may be more than one sub-market yard. For every market yard or sub-market yard, there has to be a market proper. On the establishment of market under section 4, section 6 prohibits local authorities from setting up or establishing or continuing or using or allowing to be set up, established, continued or used, any place in the market area for the marketing of any notified agricultural produce. Likewise, no person is permitted to use any place in the market area for the marketing of the notified agricultural produce or operate in the market area any market function otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of the Act. The exception to this prohibition is in favour of (a) a person who himself is a seller of the product concerned, and whose sale docs not exceed four quintals at a time to a person who purchases it for his own domestic consumption, (b) produce which is brought by head loads, (c) produce which, is purchased or sold by petty traders, (d) produce which is imported from outside India, (e) produce which is purchased by various fair price shop dealers from the Food Corporation of India, the Madhya Pradesh State Commodities Trading Corporation or any other agency or institution authorised by the State Government for distribution of essential commodities through the public distribution system, and (I) the transfer of the agricultural produce to a co-operative society for the purpose of securing an advance therefrom.

3. The Samitis or Market Committees arc established under section 7 of the Act. Under section 19 (1) of the Act, the Committees have been given power to levy market fees on notified agricultural produce brought for sale or sold in the market area under their jurisdiction at such rate as may be fixed by the State Government from time to time subject to the minimum rate of fifty paise and a maximum rate of two rupees for everyone hundred rupees of the price in the manner prescribed. Under section 19 (2), the market fees are payable by the buyer of such produce and is not to be deducted from the price payable to the seller. It is only if the buyer of the produce cannot be identified that all fees arc payable by the seller or by the person who brought the produce for sale in the market area. Provided further that in case or a commercial transaction between the traders 'in the market ar
















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top