A.K. Mathur, J. --1. All these petitions viz. M.P. No. 1466/90 (Nandkishore Sharma v. R.D. Richariya & others); M.P. No. 2220/91 (R.R. Dubey v. State of M.P. & others); M.P. No. 2409/91 (Jai Prakash Sahakari Griha Nirman Samiti v. State of M.P. & others); Misc. Petition No. 2682/91 (Janta Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti v. State of M.P. & others); Misc. Petition No. 2700/91 (Jagdish Prasad Sahu v. State of M.P. and others); Misc. Petition No. 3319/91 (Vidyug Shramik Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti v. State of M.P. and others); M.P. No. 3337/91 (Mahakoshal Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti v. State & others); M.P. No. 4554/91 (Amrapali Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti v. State of M.P. & others); M.P. 2272/93 (Vasundhara Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti v. State of M.P. & others); M.P. 3878/93 (Army Personnel Resettlements v. State & others); M.P. No. 4688/93 (Mansoor Ahmad v. State of M.P. & others); and M.P. No. 3868/87 (Purushottamdas Tandan & others v. State of M.P. & others), involved a common question of law and, therefore, they are disposed of by a common order. For convenient disposal of all these petitions, facts given in the case of Pushpak Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti are taken into consider