SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 536

1995 JLJ 517
(SUPREME COURT)
Dr. A.S. Anand and M.K. Mukherjee, JJ.
State of M.P. v. Shyamsunder Trivedi and others
Cr. Appeal No. 217 of 1993 from this judgment and order of M.P. High Court in Cr. A. No. 382 of 1983; Decided on 9.5.1995.

Headnote:(1) Evidence Act, 1872 -- S. 60 -- death or torture in police custody -- direct occular evidence is rarely available.

        The High Court erroneously overlooked the ground realities that rarely in case of police torture or custodial death, direct ocular evidence of the complicity of the police personnel would be available, when it observed that ‘direct‘ evidence about the complicity of these respondents was not available. Generally speaking, it would be police officials alone who can only explain the circumstances in which a person in their custody had died. [Para 16

        (2) Criminal Practice -- principle of proof beyond reasonable doubt -- cannot be applied ignoring ground realities -- torture or custodial death -- insistence on such principle may result in miscarriage of justice.

        The exaggerated adherence to and insistence upon the establishment of proof beyond every reasonable doubt, by the prosecution, ignoring the ground realities, the fact, situations and the peculiar circumstances of a given case, as in the present case often results in miscarriage of justice and makes the justice delivery system a suspect. In the ultimate analysis the society suffers and a criminal gets encouraged. Tortures in police custody, which of late are on the increase, receive encouragement by this type of an unrealistic approach of the Courts because it reinforces the belief in the mind of the police that no harm would come to them, if an odd prisoner dies in the lock-up, because there would hardly be any evidence available to the prosecution to directly implicate them with the torture. [Para 17

        (3) Penal Code, 1860 -- Ss. 304 Pt. II and 302 -- custodial death -- even if accused person cannot be said to have intended to cause death they certainly had knowledge that injuries inflicted were likely to cause death -- offence falls under S. 304 Pt. II. [Para 19

        ¼1½ lk{; vf/kfu;e] 1872 && /kkjk 60 && iqfyl vfHkj[kk esa e`R;q vFkok ;a=.kk && izR;{k pk{kq"k lk{; fcjys gh miyC/k gksrk gSA

        tc mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g fVIi.kh dh xbZ fd bu izR;fFkZ;ksa dh lg&vijkf/krk ds ckjs esa ^izR;{k* lk{; miyC/k ugha Fkk] rc mlds }kjk ;g vk/kkjHkwr okLrfodrk xyrh ls vuns[kh dh xbZ dh fd iqfyl ;a=.kk vFkok vfHkj{kk esa e`R;q ds ekeys esa iqfyl dkfeZd dh lg&vijkf/krk dk izR;{k pk{kq"k lk{; fcjys gh miyC/k gksxkA lk/kkj.kr%] iqfyl in/kkjh gh mu ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks Li"V dj ldrs gSa ftuesa mudh vfHkj{kk esa O;fDr dh e`R;q gqbZA ¿ iSjk 16

        ¼2½ nkafMd izFkk && ;qfDr;qDr lansg ls ijs lcwr dk fl)kar && vk/kkjHkwr okLrfodrkvksa dh mis{kk dj ykxw ugha fd;k tk ldrk && ;a=.kk vFkok vfHkj{kk esa e`R;q && ,sls fl)kar ds vkxzg ds ifj.kkeLo:i U;k;gkfu gks ldrh gSA

        fuf‘pr ekeys ds vk/kkjHkwr okLrfodrkvksa] rF;ksa] vofLFkfr;ksa rFkk fof‘k"V ifjfLFkfr;ksa dh mis{kk dj izR;sd ;qfDr;qDr lansg ls ijs lcwr ds LFkkiu dh vfHk;kstu i{k }kjk vfrjaftr vuq‘kfDr rFkk vkxzg ds ifj.kkeLo:i] tSlk orZeku ekeys esa gS] cgq/kk U;k;gkfu gksrh gS rFkk U;k; ifjnku i)fr lansgtud gks tkrh gSA vafre fo‘ys"k.k esa] lekt dh gkfu gksrh gS rFkk vijk/kh izksRlkfgr gksrk gSA U;k;ky;ksa ds bl izdkj ds vokLrfod :[k ls iqfyl vfHkj{kk esa ;a=.kk dks] ftuesa gky esa o`f) gks jgh gS] izksRlkgu feyrk gS D;ksafd mlls iqfyl ds eu esa ;g fo‘okl izcfyr gksrk gS fd ;fn gokykr esa NqViqV canh dh e`R;q gksrh gS rc mudh vigkfu ugha gksxh D;ksafd mUgsa ;a=.kk ls izR;{kr% vkfyIr djus ds fy, vfHk;kstu i{k dks lk{; dfBukbZ ls miyC/k gksxkA ¿ iSjk 17

        ¼3½ naM lafgrk] 1860 && /kkjk 304 Hkkx 2 rFkk 302 && vfHkj{kk esa e`R;q && ;fn ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd vfHk;qDr O;fDr;ksa dk e`R;q djus dk vk‘k; ugha Fkk rc Hkh mUgsa tkudkjh Fkh fd igq¡pkbZ xbZ {kfr;ksa ls e`r;q dkfjr gksus dh laHkkouk gS && vijk/k /kkjk 304 Hkkx 2 ds v/khu vkrk gSA ¿ iSjk 19

JUDGMENT

Dr. Anand, J. -- 1. On the fateful night, intervening 13th and 14th October, 1981, the uncivilised method of interrogation of a suspect took its toll and a fatal blow was inflicted on human dignity when custodial violence claimed yet another victim - Nathu Banjara. But for the vigilance of some members of the Bar of Rampura and the loud protestation of one of the residents of the village the crime could have gone unnoticed and unpunished.

2 According to the prosecution case on 13th October, 1981 respondent No. 4 Rajaram, Head Constable and respondent No.5, Ganniuddin, constable brought one Nathu Banjara of village Dhabala Deval to police station Rampufa for interrogation as a suspect in a murder case. At the police station respondent No. 1 Shyam Sunder Trivedi, Sub-Inspector; respondent No. 3 Ram Naresh Shukla, Head Constable alongwith respondent Nos. 4 and 5 gave beating to Nathu Banjara and tortured him with the intention of extracting a confession of guilt from him in connection with the murder of one harijan woman of village Singharia Piparia. As a result of the extensive injuries caused to Nathu, he died in police custody at the police station Rampura. At about 2.00 p.m. on 14.10.1981, the dead body of the deceased Nathu was removed in a jeep, belonging to the fisheries department Rampura to the hospital for post-mortem examination with the ultimate object of cremating the deceased, as an 'unclaimed body', for which respondent No.1 had already initiated some steps. Some residents of the village including some members of the Bar of Rampura who had come to know about the torture of Nathu at the police station, kept a watch over the police station and on noticing the removal of the dead body of Nathu in the jeep, they followed the jeep and reached the hospital. The dead body was removed to the mortuary. The members of the bar and others requested Dr. Naraindas Neema PW 22 not to perform the autopsy till the arrival of higher authorities. Naib Tehsildar Rathore PW 10 who arrived at the hospital in the meanwhile got the mortuary locked and sealed at the insistence of the protestors. On telephonic information given to the District Magistrate about the protests at the hospital and the gathering of a large crowd, the Superintendent of Police and the additional District Magistrate PW 20 reached the hospital in the evening. A written report Ex. P/1 signed by some of the residents of Rampura was given to the District Magistrate who ordered the holding of a Magisterial enquiry into the matter. Shri Bhat PW 20, the Additional District Magistrate was appointed as the Enquiry Officer. He commenced an enquiry immediately and prepared the panchnama Ex. P/22 of the dead body and sent it for post mortem examination vide requisition memo Ex. P/6, which was also signed by respondent No.1 Shyamsunder Trivedi. The post Mortem examination was conducted by Dr. Mehta PW 7. The Doctor in the post-mortem report, Ex. P-7, noticed the following multiple injuries on the deceased :--

1. Irregular reddish blue contusion of 3 cm x 2cm on the Rt. lower eye lid Zygomatic area of Rt. side of face.

2. There are two contusions of reddish blue in (tom) oblique and parallel from outer to inner border of middle of left scapula upper 8 cm x 4 cm, lower 6 cm. x 4 cm.

3. There are multiple reddish blue contusions imposed on each other in all directions in the area of 5 to 8 cm. on lower aspect of back of left side of chest.

4. There are multiple reddish blue contusions imposed on each other of variable shape, size and direction in the area of 7 cm x 10 cm area of middle of Rt. scapula to lower part of back of Rt. side of chest.

5. Oblique reddish blue contusion from lower part of chest to lumber on Rt. side vertical 10 x 2 cm.

6. Two cross reddish blue contusions of 4 cm. x 2 cm. size in the left lumber area on the back.

7. There are four reddish blue contusions of variable length 4 to 6 cm. x 2 cm. size on outer aspect of left shoulder and middle and outer










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top