C.K.PRASAD
Adarsh Matsyodyog Sahkari Sanstha Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Rajya Matsya Vikas Nigam – Respondent
1. The petitioner, a society registered under the Cooperative Societies Act, has filed this Writ Petition for quashing of auction notice dated 16.6.1995 (Ann. P/I) and alternatively for declaring that Condition No. (1) of the said notice which, inter alia provides for experience of fishing 800 M. T. of fishes from one reservior in one year during preceding three years for participating in the auction for settlement of Gandhi Sagar reservior, be declared illegal.
2. By order dated 29.6.1995, this Court allowed the M.P. Rajya Matsya Vikas Nigam (hereinafter referred to as the Nigam for brevity) and its functionary respondents 2 and 3 to hold auction, but restrained them from finalising it.
3. All the respondents have entered their appearance and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of, at motion hearing stage itself.
4. Respondent Nigam published a notice in the news paper for settlement of fishing rights of Gandhi Sagar reservior from the date ofsett1ement till 15.6.2000. According to the terms of the notice, the bidders were required to deposit as earnest money a sum of Rs. 66 lakhs an hour before auction to enable them to participate in the au
1. M.P. Ration Vikreta Sangh v. State of M.P. = (AIR 1981 SC 2001)
3. Hammed and others v. State of J.&K. and others = (AIR 1989 SC 1899)
5. Menka Gandhi v. Union of India = (AIR 1978 SC 597)
2. M.P. v. Nandlal Jaiswal = (1987 JLJ 53
4. Maharashtra State Board of Sec. Education v. Paritosh Bhupesh etc. = (AIR 1984 SC 1543)
6. E.P. Royappa v. State of T.N. (1974) 2 SCR 347 = (AIR 1974 SC 555)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.