SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(MP) 417

K.M.PANDEY
Sukhlal Jatav – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
S.S. Chouhan, B. Raj Sharma and A.K. Barna for petitioner; K.B. Chaturvedi, Government Advocate for State.

ORDER

K.M. Pandey, J. -- l. This revision has been preferred against the order of the Session Judge/Special Judge, designated under Act No. 33 of 1989, called as the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (here in after referred as Act No. 33 of 1989).

2. The brief facts arc that the petitioner lodged a report to the police for taking action against the non-petitioners No.2 to 6. The police refused to accept this report with the result that the petitioner sent the report to the high officials including the Superintendent of Police, Gwalior, but all in vain. Thereafter, the petitioner riled a private complaint in the Court of Session Judge/Special Judge, Gwalior on 16.4.1992. The offence were exclusively triable by the Sessions Judge, designated as Special Judge under the AetNo.33 of 1989. The complaint was for offences punishable under section 3(10), (15) and under section 4 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, under section 4(2) of Civil Rights Protection Act, 1965 and under section 341 and 294 of the Indian Penal Code against the non-petitioners No.2 to 6, filed with affidavit and two documents in its








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top