SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(MP) 390

1993 JLJ 565
B.C. Varma, J.
Vinod Kumar Jajodia and others v. Brij Shushan Agarwal
C. Revn. No. 91 of 1987; against the order passed by Shri N.S. Azad, 3rd, Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Bilaspur, in Civil Suit No. 18-B of 1985; Decided on 30.11.1987.

Advocates:
Ravindra Shrivastava for applicants; Ravish Agarwal for non-applicant.

Headnote:(1) Civil Courts Act, 1958 -- (M.P.) -- Ss. 7 (2) and 8 -- Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge -- exercises jurisdiction of District Judge himself -- he is entitled to act as "Principal Civil Court" -- suitfor more than Rs. 20,000/can be directly instituted in his Court.

       An Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge appointed in any district has the same powers as the District Judge has, and is entitled to exercise jurisdiction of the Court of District Judge. He also is entitled to exercise functions of Principal Civil Court jurisdiction like the District Judge himself. That being the present position after the substitution of sub-section (2) of section 7 and section 8 of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 1958 by M.P. Act No.7 of 1980, there is no substance in the argument that a suit of the value of more than Rs. 20,000/- cannot be originally instituted in the Court of Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge. [Para 3

       (2) Civil Courts Act, 1958 (M.P.) --S.8 (1) –Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge -- can exercise all powers of the District Judge even in absence of general or special order.

       The reading of section 8 of the Act and the context in which the words "subject to any general or special orders of the authority by which he is appointed" only means that in a case where there exists any general or special orders of the authority, the exercise of jurisdiction of the Court to which he is additional shall be in accordance with that order. However, it is difficult to say that such Additional Judge will not be competent to exercise jurisdiction and function as the Court to which he is additional in absence of such general or special orders of the authority by which he is appointed. 1973 JLJ 21 (FB) relied on. [Para 4

       

ORDER

B.C. Varma, J. -- 1. The question for decision in this revision is whether a civil suit of the value of more than Rs. 20,000/- can be directly instituted in the Court of Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge?

2. Section 6 of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 1958 (called here-in after as the Act) (Act No. 19 of 1958) prescribes the limit of original jurisdiction of Civil Courts, According to it, Court of Civil Judge (Class II) can entertain, hear and determine any suit or original proceeding of a value not exceeding Rs. 10,000/-, Civil Judge Class-I not exceeding Rs. 20,000/- and the Court of District Judge and the Court of Additional District Judge shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine any suit or original proceeding without restriction as regards value. According to section 7, the Court of the District Judge shall be the Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction in the Civil district.

Sub-section (2) of section 7 which has been substituted by M.P. Act No.7 of 1980 with retrospective effect, is as follows:

"(2) An additional Judge to the Court of a District Judge, an Additional District Judge and an Additional Judge to the Court of an Additional District Judge shall discharge any of the functions of a District Judge, including the functions of Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction which the District Judge may, by general or special order, assign to him and in the discharge of such functions he shall exercise the same powers as the District Judge." It will be useful to quote section 8 also, that section reads as follows:

"8. Appointment of additional judges. –

(1) An Additional Judge or Judges to the Court of District Judge, Additional District Judge, Civil Judge Class I or Civil Judge Class II may, whenever it appears necessary or expedient, be appointed to the Court of District Judge or Additional District Judge or Civil Judge Class I or Civil

Judge Class II, as the case may be and such Additional Judge shall exercise the jurisdiction of the Court to which he is appointed and the powers of the Judge thereof, subject to any general or special orders of the authority by which he is appointed as to the class or value of the suit which he may try, hear or determine.

(2) An officer may be appointed an Additional Judge of one or more Courts and an Officer who is a Judge of one Court may be appointed an Additional Judge of another Court or of other Courts."

3. With formation of the Higher Judicial Service in the State of Madhya Pradesh, persons belonging to this class of service are appointed either District Judges or Additional Judges to the Court of District Judges. According to sub-section (2) of section 7 of the Act, they are competent to discharge any of the functions of a District Judge including the functions of Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction which the District Judge may by general or special order, assign to them and in the discharge of such functions they shall exercise the same powers as the District Judge. The provisions of sub-section (2) of section 7, when read with section 8, and particularly the clause"..... such Additional Judge shall exercise the jurisdiction of the Court to which he is appointed and the powers of the Judge thereof," as appearing in section 8, make it clear that when a person is appointed an Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, he exercises the jurisdiction of that Court, namely, the Court of District Judge, and is also entitled to exercise the same powers, subject of course, to any general or special orders of the authority by which he is appointed as to the class or the value of the suit which he may try, hear or determine. Thus, an Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge appointed in any district has the same powers as the District Judge has, and is entitled to exercise jurisdiction of the Court of District Judge. He also is entitled to exercise functions of Principal Civil Court jurisdiction like the District Judge himself. T








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top