SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(MP) 486

S.RATNAVEL PANDIAN, G.N.RAY
Jayant Vitamins Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Chaitanya Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram for appellant; N. Natrajan for respondents.

JUDGEMENT

S. Ratnavel Pandian, J. -- 1. This appeal is directed by M/s. Jayant Vitamins Ltd. canvassing the correctness of the Order dated 12.4.90 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench in Misc. Criminal Case No. 42 of 1990 allowing the petition filed by the first respondent, Chaitanya kumar. The appellant- company preferred a complaint dated 14.11.1988 with reference to an incident in October, 1986 against the first respondent (arrayed as A-2) and four others before ~he police under sections 420, 408 read with section 34 IPC on the allegations of criminal conspiracy, cheating, criminal breach of trust. On the basis of the complaint, a case was registered on 5.11.1988 in Crime No. 286 of 1988, a number of documents were seized. However, after 9 months it appears that the investigating officer arrived at a conclusion that as the allegations were found to be of internal dispute of the company and as there was no basic evidence, there was no hope of success and consequently he closed the investigation. On 23.9.1989, the Sub-Inspector of Ratlam Police Station was transferred. Thereafter, under the direction of the Superintendent of Police, further investigation in resp






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top