SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 371

R.C.LAHOTI
Ram Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Shri Ramkishan Tayal – Respondent


Advocates:
B.G. Apte for appellant; B.S. Agarwal for respondents.

ORDER

R.C. Lahoti, J. -- 1. The plaintiff has come up in appeal aggrieved by an order of the trial Court holding an application u/s 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to be not maintainable on account of bar created by section 69(1) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

2. The plaintiff and defendants entered into a partnership on 15.12.1976. It appears that the defendant No. 1 received certain payments relating to partnership and misappropriated the amount to his own use without distributing the same in accordance with the terms of partnership. On 1.6.1979, an application u/s 20 of the Arbitration Act was filed seeking filing of the partnership agreement, incorporating the arbitration agreement, in the Court and, thereafter, taking an account through arbitration of the amount due and payable to the plaintiff and awarding the same to the plaintiff.

3. The plaintiff also moved an application seeking an interim injunction restraining the defendant No. 1 from realising any other payments due to the partnership.

4. The defendant No. 1 filed a reply to the application and took an objection therein that the partnership being not registered, the application was not maintainable. Therein, it was a


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top