SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 323

V.D.GYANI
Shambhu Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
N.S. Purohit for petitioners; G. Desai, Panel Lawyer for State.

ORDER

V.D. Gyani, J. -- 1. By this petition under section 482, CrPC the petitioners pray for quashing for the order dated 14.7.1990, passed by the 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratlam, in Sessions Trial No. 20 of 1990, thereby framing charge under section 366/34 IPC against the petitioners.

2. Before taking up the grounds challenging the framing of charge, it would not be out of place to record a few basic facts giving rise to the prosecution: Mt. Gangabai, a widow, on 15.5.1989 lodged a report with the police complaining that her daughter Lilabai, aged about 20 years (as given in the FIR) was forcibly taken away from a well by her uncle Dhulsingh s/o Rama and Narsingh s/o Rama, both residents of village Aligarh in district Ratlam. It is also to be found in the FIR that Lilabai was married to Balusingh of village Somchiri. It was a customary matrimonial alliance, known as NATRA, which was witnessed by Fatta and Rama Gujar.

3. On the basis of this report a case under section 366 IPC was registered at police station Tal, and investigated. On completion of investigation, charge-sheet was filed against as many as fourteen persons, and charges as stated above were framed against them.

4. Ou

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top