P.C.PATHAK
Laliya Bai – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh – Respondent
P.C. Pathak, J. -- 1. This is an appeal under section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, by the claimant.
2. The appellant filed a petition claiming compensation of Rs.40,000/- against the respondents on the allegation that her husband deceased Galju died on 18.10.1981 while he was going on a cycle on account of a violent dash given by a truck No. MPJ-7314 driven by the respondent Hajari and owned by Mohanlal Rajput since deceased now represented by the respondents Nos. 1 to 5 in this appeal. The vehicle was insured in the name of Mohanlal with the Insurance Company (respondent No.6). It was, therefore, prayed that the compensation be awarded jointly and severally against the driver, owner and the Insurance Company. The owner and the driver filed a Joint written statement opposing the claim. They further submitted that on 12.1.1977, they had transferred the truck to Narendra Kumar Taneja and also handed over possession to him. Therefore, they are not liable to pay any compensation. While describing Mohanlal as late Mohanlal, they did not specifically deny Mohanlal's death around June, 1978. The Insurance Company filed written statement opposing the claim. By amendment, it
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.