SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 295

P.C.PATHAK, FAIZAN UDDIN
Rajya Gramin Vikash Sansthan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
R.K. Pandey for petitioner; D‘silva for respondent No.5.

ORDER

Faizan Uddin, J. -- 1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the proceedings before the Assistant Labour Commissioner and the order of reference dated 1.12.1989 (Annexure P.15) made by the Add!. Commissioner (Labour) under section 10(1) read with section 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') referring the dispute to the Labour Court.

2. The petitioner is a Department of the Government of Madhya Pradesh known as "State Institute for Rural Development" (hereinafter referred to as the Sate Institute). Respondent No.5 Naresh Kumar was appointed as Driver in the petitioner State Institute by order dated 19th May, 1987 (Annexure P.2). By order dated 16th August, 1988 (Annexure P.5) the services of respondent No. 5 were terminated. Respondent No. 5 raised an industrial dispute by making an application under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, before the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Jabalpur. The petitioner State Institute entered appearance before the Assistant Labour; Commissioner and filed reply stating that it is purely a department of the State Government and the activ













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top