SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 202

B.M.LAL
Indira Gangele – Appellant
Versus
Shailendra Kumar Gangele – Respondent


ORDER

B.M. Lal, J. -- 1. This revision raises a short question about the date of payment of maintenance pendente lite granted by the Matrimonial Court to the respondent indigent spouse, in the exercise of its jurisdiction u/s. 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), i.e. from the date of the institution of the suit proceedings, date of application made u/s. 24 of the Act or from the date of order passed by the Court directing payment of maintenance pendente lite to the respondent.

2. The short facts leading to this revision are as under :

The non-applicant in this revision petition Shailendra Kumar Gangele brought an action against the petitioner Smt. Indira Gangele, his wife, u/s. 13 of the Act for seeking a decree of annuling the marriage.

3. Smt. Indira Gangele, it appears that after receiving the writ of summons of the suit on 26.11.1986, filed an application u/s. 24 of the Act claiming maintenance pendente lite and expenses of the suit proceedings. The said application has been adjudicated by the learned Matrimonial Court, Satna, by order dated 4.8.1987, directing Shailendra Kumar Gangele to pay Rs.200/- p.m. as maintenance pendente lite and Rs












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top