SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(MP) 226

R.D.SHUKLA
Ramsingh – Appellant
Versus
Shri Rajiv Lochan Trust – Respondent


Advocates:
M.M. Sapre with Abhay Sapre for appellants; R.K. Pandey for respondent.

JUDGMENT

R.D. Shukla, J. -- This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 13-8-1984 of First Additional District Judge, Raipur, passed in Civil Appeal No. 30-A of 1976, whereby, while setting aside the decree of the trial court, the plaintiffs suit for declaration that Shri Kuleshwar Mahadeo Temple. Nawapara (Rajim) and its property vests in the plaintiff-committee (a Trust) has been decreed.

2. The brief history of the case is that the plaintiff-respondent is a public Trust and it filed a suit through its working Trustee Mehant Laxminarayan Das on 29-1-1975 with the assertion that the plaintiff is a Public Trust registered under the M.P. Public Trusts Act, 1956. That, the temple of Kuleshwar Mahadeo is situated in a place where the three rivers, i.e. Mahanadi, Sodhu and Padri, meet together. The temple and its properties are vested in the plaintiff-Committee, vide Judgment passed in First Appeal No. 73 of 1920, on 12-4-1921, by the Court of Judicial Commissioner of Central Provinces.

That, the defendants are the Pujaris of the said temple of Kuleshwar Mahadeo under orders and connivance of the Trust Committee. They were allowed to retain small share in the offering



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top