1991 JLJ 715
B.C. Verma and D.M. Dharmadhikari, JJ.
Mukund Das and another v. State of M.P. and others
M.P. No. 3537 of 1990;
Decided on 11-7-1991.
(2) Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1990 (M.P.) -- Constitution of India -- Sch. VII, List-II, entry 5 -- legislature of a State -- is competent to enact Adhiniyam which relates to local Government -- question of motive does not arise when there is competency. AJR 1966 SC 1571 followed. [Para 7
(3) Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1990 (M.P.) -- S. 4 -- M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 -- S. 104 -- provisions under S. 4 of the Adhiniyam -- are not invalid -- there is no excessive delegation to the State -- no question of hearing opportunity to the residents for formulating area of Gram Silbha arises n area of Patwari circle fixed under S. 104 of the Code has been rightly taken to be area of Gram Sabha. AJR 1967 SC 1048, AJR 1968 SC 1344, AIR 1980 SC 882, AJR 1990 SC 261, (1972) LWLR 1373 and AJR 1982 Patna 1 relied on. AJR 1971 SC 40, AJR 1974 SC 555, AJR 1978 SC 597, AJR 1987 SC 1239, AJR 1981 SC 818, (1990)2 SCC 48, AJR 1966 SC 1571 and (1990)2 SCC 746 distinguished. [Paras 9 to 13
(4) Constitution of India -- Art.40 -- M.P. Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1990 -- Ss. 4, 122 and 123 -- establishment of Patwari circle as area of Gram Sabha under S. 4 of the Adhiniyam -- does not offend Art. 40 of the Constitution -- it is a convenient mode of governance and may also achieve economic viability -- change may also be effected under section 122 or 123 wherein safeguards have been provided to prevent any abuse of the powers conferred on State Government and prescribed authority. [Paras 16 & 17
(5) Enactment -- powers given to any authority vide a provision of enactment -- abuse of the powers noticed -- action may be struck down not the provision itself AJR 1967 SC 1048 followed. [Para 16
(6) Enactment -- policy under an enactment found to be not much useful -- may be revised. AJR 1980 SC 379 followed. [Para 16
(7) Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1990 (M.P.) -- S. 34 -- provision under -- suffers no vice of arbitrariness -- provision for show cause notice and enquiry contained therein -- provide sufficient safeguard to the office-bearer sought to be removed from the office. AJR 1984 SC 1361 and AJR 1972 SC 168 distinguished. [Para 20
(8) Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1990 (M.P.) -- S. 13 -- rotation system employed for reservation of women -- ensures due and proper representation to women in local administration. 1989 JLJ 550 relied on. [Paras 24 & 25
(9) Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1990 (M.P.) -- S. 36 -- M.P. Panchayat (Election and Co-option) Rules, 1990 -- Rr. 36 and 37 -- election of panchayats on the basis of political parties -- is an important requirement of present era -- provisions under are not against spirit of Art. 40 of the Constitution. [Para 26
B.C. Verma, J. -- 1. In this and in other connected writ petitions Nos. 3334, 2484, 2118, 2194, 2216, 2277, 2376, 2506, 2523, 2923, 3312, 3482, 3573, 3061, 3607, 3608, 3612, 3621, 3631, 3635, 3636, 3643, 3659, 3661, 3666, 3697, 3702, 3189, 2415, 3616, 3617, 2383, 3699, 2262, 2258, 3703, 2382 and 2249 of 1990 and 3, 4, 5, 10, 47, 49, 101, 102, 110, 216, 217, 255, 274, 415, 463 and 218 of 1991, the disposal of which shall be governed by this order, challenge is the legislative competence and the vires of certain provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam 1990, (Act No. 13 of 1990) and Rules made thereunder.
2. The Indian polity has recognised the Village Panchayats and Janpad Panchayats as the basic units of a Government. With the awakening of the desire to participate in the governance of the State, the demand for decentralisation of political power increased. In the erstwhile State of C.P. & Berar there were two Acts -- The Central Provinces and Berar Panchayats Act, 1946 and the Central Provinces and Berar Local Government Act, 1948. Similar enactments were in force in the former State of Madhya Bharat, the Vindhyachal Pradesh Region. Bhopal Region and Sironj Region.
3. After the re-organisation of the States and formation of the State of Madhya Pradesh in the year 1956, the aforesaid Acts continued to be prevalent in different regions of the Slate till before the M.P. Panchayats Act, 1962 (Act No.7 of 1962) was enacted. While mentioning the objects of this Act, it was stated that the principal need of the country as to all round rural development was generally acknowledged and could be achieved only if there be rural initiative and intelligent co-operation of the rural population and by giving the adult rural population a right to participate in the village administration. This Act provided for three tier Panchayat System containing 399 sections. Feeling need for short and simple Act, the State Legislature enacted the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Act 1981, repealing the Panchayat Act of 1962.
4. After the Government led by Bharatiya Janta Party assumed power in the State Assembly, the State Legislature enacted the Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1990 (Act No. 13 of 1990). The said Act received the assent of the Governor on 10-7-1990 and was published in the M.P. Gazette (Extraordinary) dated 31-71990. The purpose of the Act, as stated in the Preamble, is :
"An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to establishment of Panchayats with a view to ensure effective involvement of the Panchayat Raj Institutions in the local administration and development activities."
5. All these Panchayat Acts contained provisions to organise Village Panchayats and endow them with necessary powers and authority to enable them to function as unit of a self government. This is in furtherance of directive principles contained in Art-40 of the Constitution embodying the sacred wish of Mahatma Gandhi, the Father of the Nation that even a rustic person in the interior village of the country may feel proud of being a citizen of a free nation by participating in the local administration. Art. 40 of the Constitution of India reads as under:
"40. Organisation of village panchayats -- The State shall take steps to organise Village Panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government."
The inclusion of this Article 40, to quote Seerval, the learned author, "appears to have been a s op for those who held that a democratic Indian Constitution should be founded on the village as unit of Government."
6. Learned counsel for the petitioners opened their case with a severe attack to the provisions of Section 4 of the Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1990 (hereinafter referred to as the Adhiniyam). Section 4 of the Adhiniyam relating to the establishment of Gram Sabhas, is as follows:
"4. Establishment of Gram Sabha -- The State Government or the prescribed authority shall, by order, esta
7. Bates v. Lord Hailsham of St. Mary lebone = [(1972) 1 W.L.R. 1373)]
13. Management of M/s. Nally Bharat Engg. Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar = [(1990) 2 S.C.C. 48]
19. M/s. Nally Bharat Engg. Co. Ltd v. State of Bihar = [(1990) 2 S.C.C. 48]
20. Neelima Mishra v. Harinder Kaur Paintal = [(1990) 2 S.C.C. 746]
31. See Umesh Pandey v. State of M.P. & others = (1989 JLJ 550)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.