SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(MP) 765

V.S.KOKJE, R.D.SHUKLA
Nani Bai – Appellant
Versus
Ishaque Khan – Respondent


Advocates:
S.K. Jain for appellant; M.L. Dhupar for respondent No.3.

ORDER

R.D. Shukla, J. -- 1. The common questions of fact & law (excepting the quantum) are involved in Misc. Appeal Nos. 296/86, 297/86, 298/86, 325/86, 326/86,331/86 and 332/86, hence, the same, excepting the quantum, are being decided by this order.

2. Misc. Appeal No. 296/86 arises out of the judgment and award dated 14.8.86, passed in Claim Case No. 3/82; Misc. Appeal No. 297/86 arises out of the judgment and award dated 29.8.86, passed in Claim Case No. 93/81; Misc. Appeal No. 298/86 arises out of the judgment and award dated 29.8.86, passed in Claim Case No. 89/81; Misc. Appeal No. 325/86 arises out of the judgment and award dated 29.8.86, passed in Claim Case No. 90/81; Misc. Appeal No. 326/86 arises out of the judgment and award dated. 29.8.86, passed in Claim Case No. 95/81; Misc. Appeal No. 330/86 arises out of the judgment and award dated 12.8.86, passed in Claim Case No. 1/82; Misc. Appeal No. 331/86 arises out of the judgment and award dated 29.8.86, passed in Claim Case No. 97/81 and Misc. Appeal No. 332/86 arises out of the judgment and award dated 29.8.86, passed in Claim Case No. 96, by Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, west Nimar (Mandleshwar),whereby variou












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top