SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 377

R.P.AWASTHY
Vedprakash Bhaiji – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Manish Datt for applicant; R.K. Khare, Govt. Advocate for State.

ORDER

R.P. Awasthy, J. -- 1. It is a petition filed under sections 397 and 401 read with section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 9.9.93 passed in Sessions Trial No. 134/93, by Shri R.B. Singh, Third Additional Judge to the Court of Sessions Judge, Sagar, by virtue of which order charges under section 306 read with section 34 of the IPC have been framed against the accused who are petitioners in Criminal Revision No. 597/93, Criminal Revision No. 612/93 and Criminal Revision No. 4186/93. As all of the three cases relate to one and single order passed by the learned AJ to SJ Sagar and in all of the said three cases, similar questions of law and facts are involved, all of the said three cases are being disposed of by this single order.

2. The facts of the case are as follows:

According to the prosecution Vedprakash Bhaiji (petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 612/93), Prakash Chand and Vinod Kumar (petitioners in Criminal Revision No. 597/93) and Mahesh Vaidhya (Petitioner in Misc Cr. Case No. 4186/93) as well as Rajesh Godre had advanced loan amounting to Rs. 65,000/- to Ramesh Kumar Sadholia. Thereafter, Ramesh Kumar Sadholia paid Rs. 65,000/- to Rajesh Godre.

3. One day prior to th




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top