SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 611

J.G.CHITRE
Ramchandra – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
M.A. Khan with J.K. Joshi for applicant; Girish Desai, Deputy Government Advocate for State.

ORDER

J. G. Chitre, J. -- 1. The applicant is praying for bail. He has been charged for committing offences punishable under S. 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the N .D.P .S. Act').

2. Prosecution case is that on 9.9.93 about 8.15 p.m. T.I.,S.M. Khan in charge of P.S. Rajendra Nagar Indore got information that a person wearing green colour shirt and travelling in a private V.D.O. Coach bus beating No. MPC-9 from Indore to Bombay was possessing brown sugar. Thereafter, the police took necessary steps and the applicant was caught in the said bus. 3 Kg. of brown sugar was found kept in a bag handing on the shoulder of the applicant. The search was taken in presence of panch witnesses.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant Shri M.A. Khan with Shri J.K. Joshi submitted that important provisions of NDPS Act have not been complied with by the prosecution and that has resulted in injustice. He placed reliance on a judgment of Supreme Court in the matter of State of Punjab v. Balbirsingh reported in judgments to day 1994 (2) at page 109 and submitted that Supreme Court has held that provisions of S. 50 are mandatory and non-complianc






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top