SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 810

AJIT SINGH, SANJAY YADAV
Ambika Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Ram Shiromani alias Chandrika Prasad Dwivedi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ajit Singh, J.

1. This petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution, is directed against the order dated 28-4-2004 passed in Civil Suit No. 33-A/2004 by the Fifth Additional District Judge, Rewa, whereby he has directed the Petitioners to pay ad-valorem court-fee on the sale consideration mentioned in the sale deed dated 21-10-1998.

2. The Petitioners are Plaintiffs in the civil suit filed against the Respondents in the year 1999. In the civil suit, Bhuar Rai was Plaintiff No. 1 and after his death the name of his widow Sitrajia was substituted in the plaint in the year 2001. The plaint contains the relief that the sale deed dated 21-10-1998 executed by Plaintiff No. 1 be declared inoperative, void and illegal as his thumb impression was obtained by misrepresentation. Another relief sought is that Respondent No. 1 be permanently injuncted from interfering with the Plaintiff's possession over the suit property. The sale consideration mentioned in the sale deed is Rs. 1,49,000/-. The Plaintiffs have paid Court-fee of Rs. 60/- for the relief of declaration and Rs. 30/- for the relief of permanent injunction i.e. total Rs. 90/-

3. The trial Court, after hearing the Petitioners,














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top