SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 113

SANJAY YADAV
Shrikant Pandya – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


ORDER

Sanjay Yadav, J.

1. Shri Vasudeo Bhatt, learned Counsel for the Petitioner.

2. Petitioner by way of present petition calls in question the legality of order dated 14-9-2009 passed by the Appellate Authority under Right to Information Act, 2005; whereby, the appeal preferred by the Petitioner against an order dated 2-6-2008 passed by District Education Officer/District Information Officer, whereby the Information sought by the Petitioner regarding the entire personal/service record of Shri M.S. Parihar, Sankul Pracharya has been turned down.

3. The case of the Petitioner is that he filed an application under Section 6(1) of Right to Information Act, 2005 on 1-5-2008 for supplying him 'certified copy' of complete service book and personal file of Shri M. S. Parihar, Sankul Pracharya, Karri.

4. The said application of the Petitioner was rejected on 2-6-2008 on the ground that the person concerned, i.e. said M.S. Parihar had declined to part with his service record and the personal file. Aggrieved of this order the Petitioner preferred an appeal before the first appellate authority.

5. The said appeal was dismissed on 8-8-2008 whereagainst the Petitioner filed a second appeal before M.










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top