SHANTANU KEMKAR
Ratan Bai Gehlot – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. With consent, heard finally.
Petitioner claims to be widow of one Narendra Singh Gehlot who was working in the Higher Education Department of the State Government. She was getting pension through the fifth respondent Bank in pursuance to the letter dated 29.12.1990 (Annexure A-I) issued by the District Treasury Officer, Ratlam on the basis of Pension Payment Order No. PA3/F/7065.
2. The fifth respondent State Bank of Indore vide order dated 17.1.2007 (Annexure A-2) informed the petitioner that she ho' been paid excess pension as she should have been paid family pension at the rate of Rs. 1275/- per month, whereas she wrongly been paid pension at the rate of Rs: 1483/- per month, hence a recovery of Rs. 34,468/- at the rate of Rs. 1,000/- per month was ordered from her future pension.
3. Feeling aggrieved by the said letter/order dated 17.1.2007 (Annexure A2) the petitioner had approached this Court by filing a Writ Petition No. 4515/ 2008 (S). The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 18.12.2008 directing the respondent to consider and decide the petitioner's grievance and till her representation is decided the interim order passed on 4.9.2008 stayi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.