1. This civil revision has been preferred by the revisionist for setting aside the impugned order dated 16.1.2008 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Vidisha in Case No. 2/A-90/07-08.

2. Briefly stated relevant facts are that Dr. Chiranjilal, predecessor of respondents No.1 to 6 submitted an application under section 10 (4) of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 for fixation of standard rent against the revisionist in respect of the premises occupied by the latter. The Rent Controlling Authority-cum-Sub Divisional Officer, Vidisha vide his order dated 26.8.1989 made the fixation @ Rs. 75/- p.m. per room and Rs. 50/p.m. for Varanda. Revisionist, who was in occupation of three rooms and one Varanda was held liable to pay the rent in all to the tune of Rs. 275/- p.m. with effect from 16.8.1984. The Rent Controlling Authority issued a letter to the Court of Civil Judge Class-I Vidisha for execution of the said order. Execution proceeding No. 5 x 86 x 87 x 90 was initiated by the said Court. Said proceedings were stayed in Civil Revision No. 465/2001 by this Court. It was finally held by this Court vide order dated 3.1.2003 that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to execute