A.K.SHRIVASTAVA, BRIJ KISHORE DUBE
Khamir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Hadheshyam Bansal – Respondent
1. Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 3.9.2009 passed by the Additional Judge to the Court of Civil Judge Class I, Shivpuri in Civil Suit No. 4-B/2009 dismissing two applications filed by the defendant/petitioner-one under section 11 of the Stamps Act read with Rules 15 and 17 of the M.P. Stamp Rules and another under Order XIV Rule 5 read with section 151 of CPC, the petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
2. No exhaustive statement of facts is required to be narrated for the purpose of disposal of this writ petition, suffice it to say that a suit on the basis of promissory note executed by defendant/petitioner in favour of plaintiff/respondent has been filed for relisation of a sum of Rs.41,000/-. According to the plaint averments, the defendants/petitioner executed a promissory note on 15.3.2006 for Rs.30,000/- in favour of plaintift7respondent and took loan amount of Rs. 30,000/
It was agreed between the parties that the said amount will be paid alongwith interest at the rate of two percent per annum whenever the demand is made by the plaintiff. Since the amount of promissory note was not paid, hence, the plaintiff after giv
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.