SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 108

ALOK ARADHE
Makhano Kori – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shivendra Singh for petitioner:
MPS Raghuvanshi. Additional Advocate General for respondents.

ORDER

1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally.

2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of the order dated 16.11.2010 by which Collector has directed the Sub-Divisional Officer to take action for removal of the petitioner under section 40 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evan Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

3. Facts giving rise to the filing of the writ petition briefly stated are that the petitioner was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Mevli, District Data on 11.2.2010. It is the case of the petitioner that she belongs to reserved category and since in the elections, she defeated the candidate for the post of Sarpanch belonging to the rival belongs, he is not cooperating with the petitioner and is not handing over the records. It has been averred in the writ petition that petitioner has made several complaints to the authorities which have been annexed as Annexure P/5 with the writ petition however instead of taking any action on the complaints submitted by the petitioner, the Collector by order dated 16.11.2010 has directed the Sub-Divisional Officer that since on account of personal disp









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top