ALOK ARADHE
Makhano Kori – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of the order dated 16.11.2010 by which Collector has directed the Sub-Divisional Officer to take action for removal of the petitioner under section 40 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evan Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).
3. Facts giving rise to the filing of the writ petition briefly stated are that the petitioner was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Mevli, District Data on 11.2.2010. It is the case of the petitioner that she belongs to reserved category and since in the elections, she defeated the candidate for the post of Sarpanch belonging to the rival belongs, he is not cooperating with the petitioner and is not handing over the records. It has been averred in the writ petition that petitioner has made several complaints to the authorities which have been annexed as Annexure P/5 with the writ petition however instead of taking any action on the complaints submitted by the petitioner, the Collector by order dated 16.11.2010 has directed the Sub-Divisional Officer that since on account of personal disp
2. Mansukhlal Vithaldas Chauhan v. State of Gujrat
3. State of U.P. v. Maharaj Dharmendra Prasad Singh = (1989) 2 SCC 505
4. Anirudhsinghji V. Karansingji Jadeja v. State of Gujrat = AIR 1995 SC 2390
5. Panchamchand v. State of Himachal Pradesh
1. Surjit Ghosh v. Chairman & Managing Director, United Commercial Bank and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.