SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 514

2010 (3) MPWN 34
Piyush Mathur J.
Bhupendra Singh Kushwah
Versus
State of M.P.
WP. No. 3101 of 2010 (G);
Decided on: 14.7.2010.

Advocates appeared:
D.S. Raghuwanshi for petitioner; Ami Prabal, Dy. Advocate General and Praveen Newaskar, Dy. Government Advocate for respondents.

Headnote:(1) Natural Justice -- blacklisting of a contractor or cancellation of his registration without show-cause notice -- is violation of cardinal principles of natural justice and audi alteram partem -- such an order deserves to be quashed on this ground alone --liberty given to State to examine correctness of documents on strength of which contractor was registered with the Department and to take appropriate action. (1975) 1 SCC 70, (1990) 3 SCC 752, (2001) 8 SCC 604 and (2007) 14 SCC 17 followed. [Paras 10 & 11

       (2) Legal Maxims -- audi alteram partem -- contractor -- registration and cancellation of registration with State Department :- incurs civil consequences -- principle of audi alteram partem requires to be necessarily complied with by the Department. (1975) 1 SCC 70, (1990) 3 SCC 752, (2001) 8 SCC 604 and (2007) 14 SCC 17 followed. [Para 8

       ¼1½ uSlfxZd U;k; & dkj.k crkvks lwpuk ds fcuk Bsdsnkj dk uke dkyh lwph esa Mkyk tkuk vFkok mldk jftLVªhdj.k jn~n fd;k tkuk & uSlfxZd U;k; rFkk nwljs i{k dks Hkh lquks ds eq[; fl)karksa dk vfrdze.k gS & ,slk vkns‘k ek= bl vk/kkj ij vfHk[kafMr fd, tkus ;ksX; gS & nLrkost] ftuds cy ij Bsdsnkj foHkkx ds lkFk jftLVªhd`r fd;k x;k Fkk] dh ‘kq)rk dh ijh{kk djus rFkk leqfpr dk;Zokgh djus ds fy, jkT; dks Lora=rk iznku dh xbZA ¼1975½ 1 ,l lh lh 70 ¼1990½ 3 ,l lh lh 752] ¼2001½ 8 ,l lh lh 604 rFkk ¼2007½ 14 ,l lh lh 17 vuqlfjrA

       ¼iSjk 10 ,oa 11½

       ¼2½ fof/kd lw= & nwljs i{k dks Hkh lquks & Bsdsnkj & jkT; ds foHkkx ds lkFk jftLVªhdj.k rFkk jftLVªhdj.k dk jn~ndj.k & flfoy ifj.kke mixr gksrk gS & foHkkx ls nwljs i{k dks Hkh lquks ds fl)kar dks vko‘;d :i ls ikyu djus dh vis{kk gSA ¼1975½ 1 ,l lh lh 70] ¼1990½ 3 ,l lh lh 752] ¼2001½ 8 ,l lh lh 604 rFkk ¼2007½ 14 ,l lh lh 17 vuqlfjrA

       ¼iSjk 8½

ORDER

1. The petitioner has challenged order dated 30.4.2010 in the present petition, whereby the Chief Engineer of Public Health Engineering Department, Gwa1ior has orderd for cancellation of the registration of the contractor as also for black listing the petitioner.

2. Shri D.S. Raghuwanshi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a Class A-1 contractor, who has been registered with the Public Health Engineering Department and has been participating in various tenders for digging tube well for the Department.

3. Shri Raghuwanshi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a departmental enquiry was conducted against an Executive Engineer viz., Shri R.N. Karaiya wherein charges of misconduct and financial irregularities were levelled against him and while passing an adverse order against him" all those contractors, who were working with the department during the tenure of Shri R.N. Karaiya, Executive Engineer were black listed by the department and their registration as contractors was cancelled without complying with the principles of natural justice.

4. Shri Raghuwanshi submits that the registration of the contractor was cancelled on the ground that incorrect document was furnished with the department at the time of registration and when a verification was made, the document was found to be contrary to the description given in the application. Shri Raghuwanshi submits that the registration as contractor was never based on any such document and the registration could not be cancelled on the strength of the incorrectness of the description of the document, without issuing a show cause notice to the petitioner.

5. Ms. Ami Prabal, learned Dy. Advocate General appearing for the State submitted that in place of filing a reply to the writ petition, she would refer to the record of the department to demonstrate that an enquiry was conducted against Shri R.N. Karaiya, Executive Engineer, wherein it was found that certain misconduct was committed by him, which goes to further demonstrate that he had un authorizedly extended a variety of benefits to the contractors working in the department and as such it was required in all fitness of things that the registration of the contractor should be cancelled and his name should be black listed and to substantiate this submission learned counsel appearing for the State read over a large number of documents to demonstrate the correctness of the aforesaid contention, but could not show any document to demonstrate that at any point of time, a show cause notice was ever issued to the petitioner before either cancelling the registration or blacklisting the petitioner.

6.Public Health Engineering is -a Department of the State of Madhya Pradesh, which is engaged in the activity of providing technical support and developing of infrastructure for providing water to the citizens and thus it performs statutory duties being a department of the State. When the State ' deals with the individuals in the matter of contract and construction, it becomes necessary for the State to act banafidely and without any bias, while complying with the mandatory provisions of law including the cardinal principle of natural justice. The Supreme Court of India while dealing with the case of black listing, has observed in the case of Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd. v. State of West Bengal, a judgment reported as (1975) 1 SCC 70 in the following terms:

"19, Where the State is dealing with individuals in transactions of sales and purchase of goods, the two important factors are that an individual is entitled to trade with the Government and an individual is entitled to a fair and equal treatment with others. A duty to act fairy can he interpreted as meaning a duty to observe certain aspects of rules of natural justice. A body may be under a duty to give fair consideration to the facts and to consider the representations but not to disclose to those persons details of information in its p

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top