SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 57

P.K.JAISWAL
Uttam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Harpreet Ruprah for petitioner;
Samdarshi Tiwari, Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1, 4 & 5
Rajneesh Gupta for respondents No.2 & 3.

ORDER

1. The petitioner is this writ petition is challenging the orders dated 1.1.2002 (Annexure P-13) passed by respondent No. 2, order dated 25.9.2002 (Annexure P-14) passed by respondent No.5 and order Elated 4.9.2003 (Annexure P-16) passed by respondent No.4.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as Panchayat Karmi, Gram Panchayat Mahgawan, Chirriya of Tahsil Gadarwara District Narsinghpur. In the year 2002, respondent No.3 was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Mahgawan. The allegation against the petitioner was that he vide Annexure P-1 to P-7 lodged various complaints against the respondent No.3, Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Mahgwan which amounts to misconduct and, therefore, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 on 10.10.2001 (Annexure P-8) directed the petitioner to appear along with the record on 20th October, 2001 before the Panchas of Gram Panchayat Mahgawan else they will take appropriate action for his removal and remove him from the post of Panchayat Karmi. In spite of notice, petitioner failed to appear before the Gram Panchayat, therefore, Gram Panchayat in its meeting dated 20.10.2001 (Annexure P-9) passed a resolution for his removal on the post of











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top