ANIL KUMAR SHARMA
Anita Pawar – Appellant
Versus
Dharmendra Sikarwar – Respondent
1. The only question involved in this revision is whether in a case instituted on a private complaint under section 190 CrPC after the report filed by the police under section 156 (3) CrPC on the direction of the Magistrate, the case can be treated as filed under section 173 (2) of CrPC.
2. Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Guna by its order dated 19.1.2010 rejected the application filed by the complainant for framing charges on the basis of the Police Report without taking evidence before the charge. In revision, the Additional Judge to the Court of Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track) Guna has allowed the revision petition filed by the complainant and directed that after receiving the report under section 156 (3) CrPC. it is not necessary to take evidence before framing charge and since the Court has already taken cognizance on Police Investigation Report submitted under section 156 (3) CrPC, the cognizance shall be treated as taken under section 190 (1) (b) CrPC.
3. It means learned Additional Sessions Judge while mentioning the provisions of section 190 (1) (b) has overlooked the provisions of that section. Section 190 CrPC. reads as under :
"190. Cognizance
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.