SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 24

R.B.DIXIT
Prema Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash Gautam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.NAIK, D.S.CHAUHAN, K.M.MISHRA,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE facts in brief shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this appeal He in a narrow compass : Plaintiffs had instituted a Civil Suit No. 464-A/1991 against the respondents-defendants for eviction and mesne profits of the suit shop which was decreed by the judgment and decree dated 27-2-1997 of Second Civil Judge Class II, Gwalior. Respondents preferred a Civil Appeal No. 24/97 which was decided by judgment and decree dated 13-3-1998 by 8th Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Gwalior, which was partly allowed only to the extent of reducing the rate of mesne profits; against which this second appeal has been admitted on following substantial questions of law

:

(1) "whether plaintiff/landlord is entitled to mesne profits from the date of filing of suit at a rate higher than the contractual rate of rent or he is entitled to get mesne profits from the date of decree for eviction ?"

(2) "whether for granting decree for mesne profits the Court should consider escalation in rental price ?"

( 2. ) LEARNED counsel of the respondents has raised a preliminary objection to the effect that in Second Appeal against the impugned judgment appellants-plaintiffs h








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top