( 1. ) THE applicant No. 1 Yesu and applicant No. 2 Beeru were convicted under Section 392 of the IPC and were sentenced to undergo R. I. for two years each and were required to pay a fine of Rs. 500. 00 each or in default they were sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month each-This judgment dated 6-11-2000 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 244 and 245/2000 was challenged by the applicants by filing the Criminal Revision was filed on 2-1-2001. It was listed for admission and for grant of bail on 8-1-2001. The revision was admitted and the applicants were granted bail. It appears, that applicant No. 1 Yesu, had filed a jail appeal against the impugned judgment dated 6-11-2000 passed in Criminal (Jail) Appeal Nos. 244 and 245/2000. This Jail Appeal was received in the office of this Court on 8-1-2001. Since the judgment appealed against was not appealable, the jail appeal did not lie. There is no provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure for filing a Criminal Revision from jail yet the office treated the jail appeal as a criminal revision. This criminal revision was listed on 9-2-2001 for admission as Criminal Revision No. 123/2001. This Court thereupon called for the r