SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 321

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
S.K. Kulshrestha, J.
Lakhanlal Sahu
Versus
State of M.P.
W.P. 7228 of 2000 Of
Decided On : May 14,2001

Advocates Appeared:
K.C.Ghildiyal, RAJENDRA TIWARI, V.S.CHOUDHARY,

Judgment

( 1. ) BY this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 7-12-2000 (Annexure P-10), by which he has been transferred in the same capacity till further orders on deputation to Municipal Corporation, Gwalior from Municipal Corporation, Sagar. Initially he had challenged his transfer on the ground that as the petitioner was officiating on the post of Executive Engineer and was in receipt of pay for the said post, the transfer of the petitioner as Assistant Engineer had the effect of lowering his status and putting him in a disadvantageous position in respect of pay and allowances but later by an amendment it has also been challenged on the ground that if Sub-sections (5) and (6) of Section 58 of the M. P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the act) are read conjointly, the State Government can order such transfers without the consent of the employee concerned of the Corporation only in exceptional cases. Reference has also been made to a Full Bench decision of this Court in Indore N. N. K. Congress and Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr. (1998 (1) MPLJ 449 = 1998 (1) JLJ 326) that the power is to be exercised with caution and sparingly in exceptional cases only. ( 2. ) AS per the case of the petitioner, he was initially appointed as Sub Engineer in the Municipal Corporation, Sagar. In 1992-93, he was promoted as Assistant Engineer. For promotion to the post of Executive Engineer the qualifying service is 5 years in the Grade of Assistant Engineer. According to the petitioner by order dated 31-7-1997 (Annexure-A/1), he was directed to look after the work of Executive Engineer and later he was given charge of the post of Commissioner by letter dated 3040-1999 (Annexure-A/2 ). The petitioner has averred that a Departmental Promotion Committee was constituted for considering the cases of promotion of eligible candidates to the post of Executive Engineer and on the recommendation of this Committee, the Mayor in Council took a decision to appoint the petitioner on the post of Executive Engineer and to grant him pay scale applicable to the said post. A copy of this decision has been filed by the petitioner as Annexure-P/6. During the period of his incumbency as Executive Engineer, whenever the post of Commissioner became vacant on account of the regular incumbent proceeding on leave or for any other reason, he was also placed in charge of that post being the senior most person in the Corporation. The petitioner has pointed out that the State Government without first according sanction for appointment of the petitioner on the post of Executive Engineer in the Municipal Corporation, Sagar, passed the order dated 7-12-2000, transferring the petitioner as Assistant Engineer to Municipal Corporation, Gwalior on deputation. The petitioner has, therefore, challenged this order on the ground that firstly the order has the effect of lowering the status from Executive Engineer to Assistant Engineer and putting him in a disadvantageous position in respect of pay and allowances and secondly, the order has not been passed in consonance with the provisions of Sub-sections (5) and (6) of Section 58 of the Act in accordance with the guidelines laid down for exercise of the power by the Full Bench in Indore N. N. K. Congress (supra ).

( 3. ) THE Respondent No. 1 State of Madhya Pradesh has filed the Return to oppugn the contentions of the petitioner and has submitted that the only aversion initially expressed by the petitioner against the transfer was that he was being transferred on a post lower than the one he holds in the parent Corporation which was groundless in that the Government had not accorded approval to the said promotion as required and the ground now introduced by amendment in assailing the validity of the transfer order is also unsustainable as the Government has the power under Sub-section (5) of Section 58 to transfer an employee from one Municipal Corporation to another on deputation f

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top