SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 385

DIPAK MISRA
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Anguri Choudhari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pranay Verma, R.K.VERMA, RAVISH AGRAWAL,

Judgment

( 1. ) INVOKING the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of the. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) the applicants have called in question the sustainability of the order dated 17-3-99 passed by the learned First Additional District Judge, Shahdol in Civil Suit No. 2-A/93.

( 2. ) THE non-applicant No. 1 as plaintiff initiated a civil action for partition and separate possession of the suit house situate over Khasra No. 1207, Burhar, Tahsil Sohagpur, District Shahdol. The case of the plaintiff in the Court below was that by Hukumnama date 26-8-41 the then Pawaidar, Shri Lal Shiv Pratap Singh, granted the aforesaid Khasra No. 1207 to Kishore Chand who later on built shops and residential accommodation. After the expiry of said Kishorchand on 1-7-72 his widow Kasturibai, the defendant No. 1, and daughter, Anguribai, the plaintiff, inherited the said land with superstructure standing on it under the provisions of Hindu Succession Act, 1956. It was pleaded that the defendants, namely, Sunil Kumar and Sanjay Kumar, the sons of Virendra had no right, title or interest over the suit property. In Paragraph 4 of the plaint it was set

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top