N.S.AZAD
Manoj Malviya – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
( 1. ) ARGUMENTS heard.
( 2. ) A perusal of certified copy of order dated 6-8-2001 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Chhindwara, in Criminal Revision No. 89/2001 filed by this petitioner, reveals that petitioners application under Section 457 of Cr. PC stood disallowed and rejected by Shri U. K. Shukla, J. M. F. C, Chhindwara on 28-4-2001, by order passed in Criminal Case No. 53/2001. It is also found disclosed on perusal of aforesaid order that this petitioner wanted to obtain on supurdagi, Auto No, MP 28-T/0540 belonging to him, which was seized in Criminal Case No. 104/2001 of Police Station, Chandameta for offence punishable under Section 34-A of the M. P. Excise Act. While disposing of Criminal Revision No. 89/2001, in rejection, it is observed by first Additional Sessions Judge, Chhindwara, that a total of 53,680 ml. liquor is seized from the aforesaid vehicle, and hence, as provided under Section 41, so also 47-A of the M. P. Excise Act, the Collector may order confiscation of the aforesaid vehicle.
( 3. ) IT is found repeatedly explained by this Court in Paramjeet Singh v. State of M. P,, reported in 1999 (1) MPWN 100 and Kailash v. State of M. P. , reported
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.